daemon > (dē'mən) > Computer Science : A program or process that sits idly in the background until it is invoked to perform its task.

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Pro-reservationists can go to hell

ANYONE WHO SAYS RESERVATIONS SHOULD BE ON THE BASIS OF CASTE OR ECONOMIC STATUS IS A MORON WHO DOESNT KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY AND ITS ECONOMY.
THE RULES ARE SIMPLE; IF YOU DONT DESERVE IT, YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE IT!

I DONT CARE IF YOU ARE ECONOMICALLY BACKWARD OR SOCIALLY BACKWARDIF YOU CANT RECOGNIZE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A STOMACH AND A HEART YOU SHOULD NOT BE TREATING SOMEONE WITH PROBLEMS IN EITHER.

IN SIMPLE LANGUAGE FOR THOSE MORONS WHO THINK THIS IS A WAR AGAINST THE LOWER CLASS. IF YOU GOT LESS THAN THE CUTTOFF PERCENTAGE FOR ADMISSION INTO A MEDICAL COLLEGE, YOU SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN A SEAT IN THERE.. WHY??? I DONT WANT SOMEONE WITH A 60% PASS RATE BEING ADDED TO THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY OF MY COUNTRY.. IT MEANS THOSE REMAINING 40% WILL DIE AND I COULD BE ONE OF THOSE... AND IF THOSE 40% DIE THEN THE ECONOMY CAN LOSE QUITE A LOT OF MONEY ..ATLEAST IN TERMS OF INCOME AND OTHER TAXES.. THINK ABOUT THAT.. NOW WHO WILL FUND YOUR ELECTIONS, GARIBI HATAO PROGRAMS, WHO WILL REHABILITATE ALL THOSE LAND GRABBERS WHO SQUAT ON PUBLIC PROPERTY MAINTAINED BY THE MIDDLE CLASS TAX PAYERS?? AND THEN LATER WHO WILL GIVE THEM FREE HOUSING.. THE GOVERNTMENT??? ..I DONT THINK SO... THE GOVERNMENT WONT HAVE MONEY BECAUSE THE MIDDLE CLASS TAX PAYERS ARE DEAD.. ATLEAST 40% OF THEM BECAUSE OF THE OBCS YOU PUT IN THOSE HOSPITALS TO TREAT THEM.
WHAT ABOUT THE OBCS WHO DIE YOU SAY?? .. DONT THEY COUNT??... WELL DO BLOOD SUCKING PARASITES COUNT? YEA THATS YOU , YOU PRO-REERVATIONIST!.. DO I CARE ABOUT NON PRODUCTIVE PEOPLE WHO LIVE OFF OTHERS BLOOD AND SWEAT?... HMMMM... LET ME THINK!!!

SO ALL YOU MORONS WHO THINK WE DONT WANT THE LOWER CLASS TO COME UP IN LIFE I'D SAY YES YOU ARE RIGHT .. IF YOU DONT DESERVE IT; YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE IT. NEXT YOU WILL BE SAYING GIVE THAT OBC A GOLD MEDAL IN A MARATHON RACE EVEN THOUGH HE CAME 62ND ..WHY ??? BECAUSE HE IS AN OBC!!.. THATS WHY!!

YOU PRO RESERVATIONISTS ARE BLINDED BY THE PROPSECTS OF BEING SPOON FED INTO A SYSTEM WE OPEN CLASS HAVE TO BREAK OUR BACKS TO GET INTO.. I DONT BLAME YOU .. YOU HAVE BEEN HABITUATED INTO THIS SYSTEM BY OUR POLICTICIANS WHO ARE USING YOU AS A VOTE BANK!

YOU ARE LIVING AT OUR COST.. AND AT THE COST OF OUR COUNTRY'S FUTURE AND PROSPERITY.
SHAME ON YOU!

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Aaj ka Goonda Raj

There is so much of public time and energy wasted on this campaign against Aamir for his comment on rehabilitating the people affected by the dam. The politicians that we elected to take care of our country seem to think that punishing someone for his point of view in a democracy is top priority, over all the terrorist attacks and other socio-economic issues we are currently facing.

Aamir has said rehabilitate the farmers who will be displaced by the dam. Those geniuses understood his hidden code language which actually meant "Stop work on the dam and go home everybody". So now they have collectively? decieded to ban his latest movie and the products endorsed by him. Wow! Justice eh!

Well, do you think the film Fana should be banned? In my opinion, NO, the film should NOT be banned.

The public of Gujrat have no problem with what Aamir said; atleast the sensible ones who know the whole story. Its only the politicians who are barking away and instigating those mindless zombies who cant think for themselves and are incapable of understanding that Aamir only wanted the poor displaced people to be rehabilitated, who have the problem. How does a plea to rehabilite a helpless community in Gujrat become something bad and against the people of Gujrat? How does it affect the dam? Did he go there and personally stop work on the dam or did anything he said that day, have that effect? Only questions, but no answers here.

You cant take away or rob someone of their livelihood because they have an opinion and have voiced that opinion. Banning the film affects everyone associated with that film; from the spot boys to the producers. Who are these politicians trying to punish anyway? And wheres the Democracy in doing this?

This attitude clearly means, you harm our vested interests and we will initimidate you and your whole clan into submission; by force if need be.

It could also mean, some fools spoke too soon, without thinking and understanding what Aamir said, and now it has become something of an ego battle. Taking back this war against Aamir would mean them admitting to have put their foot in their mouth; and thats not too good for the image of the party now is it?

What do you think?